

Yesterday as a college friend and I ate lunch discussing the upcoming football season, we began talking about the recent 2 year pay raise that Chris Johnson of the Tennessee Titans just received, a deal which will pay him an upgrade from $ 550,000 in 2010 to $2.5 million. Now to you and me this seems like a great pay raise, however for Johnson’s profession and the financial contradictions it has with rookie signings and player wages altogether, are undermining the fairness the NFL has implemented with preference for a salary cap and strong handed rule from the top. In 2010 that is an uncapped year for the league which at the end of the season will have to meet with the players union and make concessions to avoid a holdout, the financial uncertainty that runs rampant through every organization is putting teams and players future success in question. So why for this dispute among players and owners who are both part of the most popular and lucrative sport in the country I ask? Selfish owners are the obvious answer. Having a salary cap provides each team to pay a maximum amount for a team’s total salary based on that year. Last year each team was allowed to spend up to $127 million on filling its roster. $127 million for a 53 man roster which represents the most viewed sport in the U.S. In comparison to baseball and basketball that are both dwarfed by the fan fare and revenue generated by the NFL, player salaries for baseball are laughable in comparison to players value and what they actually get paid.
Take for example Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Hiroki Kuroda who will make this year just under $15.5 million dollars. First thoughts when thinking about that are, who the heck is Hiroki Kuroda and why is he making that much money. Well Mr. Kuroda is an average right handed starter, who in three full Major League seasons has never won more than 10 games, and currently sports a 3.53 ERA. It is agreeable this is a bad contract, yet in baseballs free spending system the margin for error to sink millions of dollars into a risky player are offered greater error proof as well as ability to pay world class athletes what they deserve for what they do and generate for the teams and league they are a part of. With baseball unlike football the players careers are much longer and can sustain power in their union by taking a stance against unfair pay. However where the NFL is misguided by greed in opposing a cap, players whose careers average about 3.5 years have little room to forgo a season in lockout as leverage against the league, thus only strengthening the owners position at the bargaining table. Players such as Chris Johnson who set league records last year posting 2,509 yards from scrimmage and others will suffer due to these restrictions.
Further undermining the financial structure of the NFL is rookie pay scale. Recently the St. Louis Rams signed number one overall pick Sam Bradford to a six year, $78 million dollar contract, that includes $50 million guaranteed. That means that if Bradford who has never taken a snap in the league is unfortunate enough to suffer a career ending injury in his first pre-season game, he will garner $50 million dollars over the next seven years. How can that be you might ask? How can a player like Johnson who has accomplished so much more earn so much less than a player who has done nothing yet shown “promise” to become a great player. This recent deal with Bradford and Johnson both comes at a time when the disparity for proper financial pay to players is necessary for the leagues survival. A salary cap is not the answer for next season no matter what the bar is set at. With its current financial gains and widespread appeal, the league should look to offer the fruits of its labor to its hardest workers, the players who make the league. Players like Johnson who instantly becomes the face of the franchise selling jerseys and giving their image back to the league at risk for the health on every play for what by league finances equals mediocre pay.
Though the other disagreements concerning post retirement benefits and injured player compensations will be other issues discussed after the 2010 season, the glaring need for the NFL to rethink its financial system are imperative to keep the popularity of the sport at the zenith it currently resides. Yet as this article has discussed the key to who controls the power and money will be of significant issue in deciding the leagues uncertain future and it is up to anyone’s guess on how far the owners will bend to the player’s demands for a bigger piece of the pie.















